Both Nuclino and Trello delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring period week of 20 April 2026, according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. However, response time performance differed significantly, with Nuclino averaging 84ms compared to Trello's 293ms.
- Nuclino and Trello both achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during monitoring
- Nuclino responded 3.5x faster: 84ms average vs. Trello's 293ms
- Neither provider experienced downtime; total incident time was 0 minutes for both
- Nuclino does not maintain a public status page; Trello provides official status reporting
Uptime This Week
Both providers maintained 100% uptime throughout the monitoring week with zero recorded incidents and zero minutes of total downtime. This perfect uptime reflects strong infrastructure stability for both Nuclino and Trello during this period.
Response Time
Response time diverged significantly between the two providers. Nuclino averaged 84ms response time, while Trello averaged 293ms—a 209ms difference. For real-time collaboration workloads, Nuclino's faster response profile may provide a noticeable performance advantage in user experience.
Incidents & Downtime
Neither Nuclino nor Trello recorded any incidents during the monitoring period. Both services maintained continuous availability with zero minutes of downtime, indicating stable operational performance across both platforms.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Nuclino if response time and performance are primary concerns, particularly for teams requiring sub-100ms latency. Select Trello if your priority is established incident communication and community-wide status transparency, though evaluate whether the slower average response time acceptable for your use case.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io