Monzo vs Punjab National Bank Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Uptrue monitored two banking providers over the week of April 20–26, 2026: Monzo and Punjab National Bank (PNB). Monzo achieved 100% uptime with a 58ms average response time, while PNB recorded 99.67%

🏦 Monzo vs Punjab National Bank BANKING & FINANCE · UPTRUE.IO RELIABILITY DATA Week of 20 April 2026
🏦 Banking & Finance Weekly Comparison

Uptrue monitored two banking providers over the week of April 20–26, 2026: Monzo and Punjab National Bank (PNB). Monzo achieved 100% uptime with a 58ms average response time, while PNB recorded 99.67% uptime and a 4,152ms average response time. All data comes from Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure.

TL;DR
  • Monzo: 100% uptime, 0 incidents, 58ms response time
  • Punjab National Bank: 99.67% uptime, 1 incident, 9 minutes total downtime
  • Response time gap: Monzo 58ms vs PNB 4,152ms (71× faster)
  • PNB lacks a public status page; Monzo publishes real-time service status

Uptime This Week

Monzo 100.00% Punjab Nation… 99.67% HTTP checks every 5 min · 7-day period · Uptrue independent monitoring

Monzo delivered perfect availability throughout the monitoring period with no service interruptions. Punjab National Bank experienced one incident totaling 9 minutes of downtime, resulting in 99.67% uptime. Both providers exceeded typical SLA thresholds for financial services, though Monzo's zero-incident record demonstrates superior consistency.

Response Time

Monzo 58ms Punjab Nation… 4152ms Lower is better · Median TTFB · Excludes model inference time

Monzo's average response time of 58ms indicates minimal latency, typical for modern fintech infrastructure. Punjab National Bank's 4,152ms average response time is significantly elevated for a banking platform and reflects performance challenges during normal operation. This disparity suggests architectural or geographic differences in how each provider serves requests.

Incidents & Downtime

Monzo No incidents Punjab Nation… 1 incident · 9 min Incident = 2+ consecutive failed checks · 7-day window

Monzo recorded zero incidents during the monitoring week. Punjab National Bank experienced one incident that caused 9 minutes of total downtime. The absence of incident data in PNB's case suggests either limited incident tracking or lack of public visibility into service events.

Historical Context
Banking and financial services typically operate under strict regulatory requirements and uptime expectations exceeding 99.9%. Providers in this sector increasingly face pressure to maintain sub-100ms response times as user experience and transaction speed become competitive differentiators.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Monzo for mission-critical transactions where response speed and zero downtime are non-negotiable. For organizations already embedded in PNB's ecosystem, the 99.67% uptime is acceptable for most use cases, though the 4-second latency warrants investigation. Consider a multi-provider strategy if uptime above 99.95% is required.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable?
Based on Uptrue's independent monitoring, Monzo is more reliable with 100% uptime versus Punjab National Bank's 99.67%. Monzo also demonstrates faster response times (58ms vs 4,152ms). Both exceed typical banking SLAs, but Monzo's zero-incident record over the monitoring period provides stronger assurance.
How often does Punjab National Bank experience downtime?
During the week of April 20–26, 2026, PNB experienced one incident resulting in 9 minutes of total downtime. This translates to availability of 99.67% for that period. A single week is insufficient to determine long-term incident frequency; extended monitoring would reveal typical outage patterns.
How is this data collected?
Uptrue collects all metrics through independent, continuous monitoring of both providers' public endpoints. Uptime and incident data are captured via synthetic monitoring, response times are measured from multiple global locations, and status page information is extracted directly from each provider's published systems. This approach ensures vendor-neutral, third-party validation of performance claims.
Get weekly reliability reports in your inbox
Every Monday: uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends across 200 monitored providers.
ShareX / TwitterLinkedIn
Get weekly reliability reports
Uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends — every Monday.
Uptrue TeamWebsite Monitoring Platform