collaboration

Microsoft Teams vs Monday.com Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

💬 Collaboration Tools Weekly Comparison

Microsoft Teams and Monday.com both demonstrated strong reliability during the monitoring period of April 20–26, 2026. Teams achieved 99.87% uptime with zero incidents, while Monday.com reached 100% uptime. Uptrue's independent monitoring reveals meaningful differences in response performance despite both services maintaining excellent availability.

TL;DR

Monday.com achieved 100% uptime vs. Teams' 99.87% during the monitoring week
Microsoft Teams responded 92ms faster on average (207ms vs. 299ms)
Both platforms recorded zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime
Teams lacks a public status page; Monday.com maintains one for incident notifications

Uptime This Week

Monday.com maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the week, while Microsoft Teams recorded 99.87% uptime—a difference representing approximately 11 minutes of unavailability. Both services experienced zero tracked incidents and zero total downtime minutes, suggesting the Teams figure reflects brief response delays rather than complete outages. For mission-critical collaboration workloads, both uptime figures exceed industry standards for enterprise tools.

Response Time

Microsoft Teams delivered significantly faster response times at 207ms average latency compared to Monday.com's 299ms—a 44% performance advantage. This 92ms differential may be noticeable to users performing real-time collaborative tasks, though both figures remain acceptable for web application standards. Response consistency data was not available in this monitoring window.

Incidents & Downtime

Neither platform experienced measurable incidents during the April 20–26 period. Both services logged zero incidents and zero minutes of total downtime, indicating stable infrastructure performance. Monday.com's higher uptime percentage suggests fewer momentary disruptions than Teams, though the difference is marginal at 0.13 percentage points.

Historical Context

Collaboration tools have demonstrated improving reliability over recent years as providers invest in distributed infrastructure and redundancy. However, brief response fluctuations remain common across the category as load balancing handles traffic spikes.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Microsoft Teams if response speed is critical for your deployment—the 92ms latency advantage matters in real-time collaborative scenarios. Select Monday.com if perfect availability tracking and public incident transparency are priorities. For most organizations, both services meet enterprise reliability thresholds; the choice should factor in your existing tool ecosystem and feature requirements beyond uptime.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable?

Monday.com edges ahead with 100% uptime vs. Teams' 99.87% during this monitoring period, but the 0.13% difference is marginal. Both platforms showed zero incidents and zero downtime minutes. Reliability should be evaluated across longer time horizons and specific use cases rather than single-week snapshots.

How often does Microsoft Teams go down?

During Uptrue's April 20–26 monitoring, Teams recorded zero major incidents. The 99.87% uptime figure suggests brief response delays totaling approximately 11 minutes across the seven-day period rather than a complete service outage. Historical reliability varies by region and deployment type.

How is this data collected?

Uptrue independently monitors both services' public endpoints using automated synthetic testing. Uptime percentages, response times, and incident counts derive from real-time requests to teams.microsoft.com and monday.com throughout the monitoring window. This methodology captures external user experience but does not reflect internal performance or private deployments.