collaboration

Loom vs Trello Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

💬 Collaboration Tools Weekly Comparison

Loom and Trello both achieved perfect uptime during the monitoring period of 20 April 2026, with zero incidents and zero downtime reported by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. However, significant differences in response performance emerge: Loom averaged 98ms while Trello averaged 290ms, a 3x variation that impacts user experience during peak usage.

TL;DR

Both providers maintained 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring week
Loom responded 3x faster than Trello (98ms vs 290ms average response time)
Zero total downtime minutes recorded for either service
Response time difference of 192ms may affect real-time collaboration workflows on Trello

Uptime This Week

Both Loom and Trello delivered perfect uptime at 100% during the week of 20 April 2026. No outages were detected across Uptrue's monitoring endpoints. This equal performance indicates both platforms maintained stable infrastructure throughout the monitoring period.

Response Time

Loom significantly outperformed Trello in response time metrics, averaging 98ms compared to Trello's 290ms. The 192ms gap suggests Loom's infrastructure processes requests considerably faster, which becomes noticeable in real-time collaboration features such as live editing and instant notifications.

Incidents & Downtime

Neither provider experienced any recorded incidents during the monitoring period. Both services logged zero minutes of downtime, reflecting equivalent stability in their production environments. This parity suggests both providers maintain robust incident prevention and failover mechanisms.

Historical Context

Collaboration tools in this category have generally maintained high uptime standards, though response time variations typically reflect differences in infrastructure distribution, caching strategies, and regional endpoint density rather than reliability differences.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Loom if response time sensitivity is critical for your workflows, particularly for real-time collaboration features where the 192ms difference compounds across multiple users. Select Trello if your use cases tolerate longer response times and uptime parity is your primary concern. For most teams, both services prove equally reliable, making secondary factors like feature set and pricing the deciding factors.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable overall?

Both Loom and Trello demonstrated identical reliability during the monitoring period with 100% uptime and zero incidents. Reliability parity means the choice should focus on other factors such as response time requirements and feature fit.

How often does Trello experience downtime?

During the week of 20 April 2026, Uptrue's independent monitoring recorded zero downtime incidents for Trello. Historical uptime data shows Trello maintains consistent availability, though response times vary relative to competing platforms.

How is this data collected and verified?

All measurements come from Uptrue's independent uptime monitoring network, which continuously probes both services' API endpoints and web interfaces. Response times represent average latency across all monitoring points; uptime reflects successful request completion rates. No data derives from vendor-provided status pages.