collaboration

Loom vs Nuclino Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

💬 Collaboration Tools Weekly Comparison

Loom and Nuclino both delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring period of April 20–26, 2026, according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. Loom maintained 100% availability with a 98ms average response time, while Nuclino achieved 100% uptime with a faster 84ms average response. Both services experienced zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime.

TL;DR

Both Loom and Nuclino achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring week
Nuclino responded 14ms faster on average (84ms vs. 98ms)
Combined downtime across both providers: 0 minutes
Loom maintains a public status page; Nuclino's status page is not available

Uptime This Week

Both providers maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the monitoring period, with no service interruptions recorded by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. Neither platform experienced any measurable downtime during the week of April 20–26, 2026. This represents identical reliability performance across both collaboration tools.

Response Time

Nuclino delivered faster response times at 84ms average, outperforming Loom's 98ms by 14 milliseconds. Both response times fall within acceptable ranges for collaboration tools, though Nuclino's edge provides a measurable performance advantage. The difference is unlikely to impact user experience significantly in typical use cases.

Incidents & Downtime

Zero incidents were detected for both Loom and Nuclino during the monitoring period, with no reported downtime on either platform. Neither service triggered reliability alerts or showed service degradation. This perfect incident record reflects strong operational performance from both providers during this one-week window.

Historical Context

Collaboration tools have generally demonstrated improving reliability over recent years as providers invest in redundancy and infrastructure stability. However, single-week snapshots should be contextualized within longer monitoring periods to identify patterns or seasonal variations.

Which Should You Choose?

Both providers are reliable choices for this monitoring period. Select based on feature fit and performance requirements rather than uptime—both delivered identical 100% availability. If response time is critical to your workflow, Nuclino's 14ms advantage may justify evaluation, though both speeds support typical collaboration use cases.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable: Loom or Nuclino?

During April 20–26, 2026, both achieved identical 100% uptime with zero incidents. Neither provider showed reliability advantages during this period. Longer-term monitoring data would be needed to identify sustained reliability differences.

How often does Loom experience downtime?

Uptrue's monitoring detected zero downtime for Loom during the week of April 20–26, 2026. The service maintained 100% availability with no incidents. For historical downtime frequency, review Loom's public status page or request extended monitoring data.

How is this reliability data collected?

All statistics in this report come from Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure, which continuously tests uptime, response times, and incident detection without relying on provider-reported data. This approach ensures unbiased, third-party measurement of service reliability.