Ledger vs Uniswap Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Ledger and Uniswap both delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring period, with zero reported incidents across all tracked services. Ledger responded to requests in 130ms on average, while Uniswap

Ledger vs Uniswap CRYPTO & WEB3 · UPTRUE.IO RELIABILITY DATA Week of 20 April 2026
₿ Crypto & Web3 Weekly Comparison

Ledger and Uniswap both delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring period, with zero reported incidents across all tracked services. Ledger responded to requests in 130ms on average, while Uniswap achieved faster response times at 111ms, according to Uptrue's independent monitoring.

TL;DR
  • Both providers maintained 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring period
  • Uniswap's API layer showed 96.40% uptime historically, while all other monitored components achieved 100%
  • Uniswap responded 19ms faster on average (111ms vs. 130ms)
  • Data collected via Uptrue's independent external monitoring of both providers' public infrastructure

Uptime This Week

Ledger 100.00% Uniswap 100.00% HTTP checks every 5 min · 7-day period · Uptrue independent monitoring

Both Ledger and Uniswap achieved 100% uptime during the monitoring period with zero downtime events. Uniswap's official status page indicates a historical concern: the API component reported 96.40% uptime over the Jan-Apr 2026 period, suggesting occasional reliability issues distinct from the current snapshot. All other Uniswap components, including UniswapX and both Unichain networks, maintained perfect uptime.

Response Time

Uniswap 111ms Ledger 130ms Lower is better · Median TTFB · Excludes model inference time

Uniswap delivered faster response times at an average of 111ms compared to Ledger's 130ms—a 19ms difference that favors Uniswap for latency-sensitive operations. Both providers performed within acceptable ranges for web infrastructure, though the margin suggests Uniswap's infrastructure optimization edges ahead for real-time transaction scenarios.

Incidents & Downtime

Ledger No incidents Uniswap No incidents Incident = 2+ consecutive failed checks · 7-day window

Zero incidents were recorded for either provider during the monitoring period. However, Uniswap's historical data reveals API instability earlier in the monitoring window, with 96.40% uptime suggesting at least one notable outage or degradation event. Ledger's incident history across all monitored components remained clean.

Historical Context
Crypto and Web3 infrastructure has historically experienced higher volatility than traditional cloud services, driven by network congestion, smart contract interactions, and rapid scaling demands. Providers in this category often segment reliability by component—API layers, application servers, and blockchain nodes frequently show divergent uptime metrics.

Which Should You Choose?

For maximum uptime assurance, either provider is defensible for the current period. Choose Ledger if consistent response times and incident-free history are priorities; choose Uniswap if lower latency is critical for trading or liquidity operations. Review Uniswap's API performance if your integration depends on that specific component—its 96.40% historical uptime warrants architectural redundancy.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable?
During the monitoring period, both achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents. Ledger shows a cleaner incident history across all components. Uniswap's API layer experienced occasional outages earlier in the monitoring window (96.40% uptime Jan-Apr 2026), though all other components maintained 100%. The choice depends on your tolerance for API-specific reliability risk.
How often does Uniswap go down?
Uniswap reported zero incidents during the current monitoring period and maintains 100% uptime for UniswapX and Unichain services. However, the API component showed 96.40% uptime from January to April 2026, indicating occasional outages. This suggests Uniswap experiences periodic API degradation but maintains stable blockchain and application layer services.
How is this data collected?
All metrics come from Uptrue's independent external monitoring of both providers' public infrastructure. Uptime and incident data are cross-referenced with official status pages; response times are measured via synthetic requests from Uptrue's monitoring network. This approach is vendor-independent and does not rely on provider self-reporting.
Get weekly reliability reports in your inbox
Every Monday: uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends across 200 monitored providers.
ShareX / TwitterLinkedIn
Get weekly reliability reports
Uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends — every Monday.
Uptrue TeamWebsite Monitoring Platform