ICICI Bank and Yes Bank both maintained perfect uptime during the monitoring period of 20 April 2026, with zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime. However, Yes Bank demonstrated significantly faster response times at 313ms compared to ICICI Bank's 908ms, indicating a material difference in user experience despite identical reliability metrics.
- Both providers achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the week of 20 April 2026
- Yes Bank responded 595ms faster on average (313ms vs. 908ms)
- Neither provider reported official status pages
- Total downtime across both services: 0 minutes
Uptime This Week
Both ICICI Bank and Yes Bank maintained 100% uptime throughout the monitoring period with zero recorded incidents. This perfect reliability suggests both platforms sustained continuous service availability without interruption during the week of 20 April 2026.
Response Time
Yes Bank delivered substantially faster response times at 313ms average, compared to ICICI Bank's 908ms. This 66% speed advantage in Yes Bank's favor represents a meaningful difference in user experience, particularly for latency-sensitive banking operations.
Incidents & Downtime
Neither provider experienced any incidents or downtime during the monitoring period. Both services maintained uninterrupted availability, indicating stable infrastructure and operational practices across the week.
Which Should You Choose?
For organizations prioritizing both reliability and performance, Yes Bank's combination of perfect uptime and superior response times makes it the stronger technical choice. ICICI Bank remains reliable for uptime-critical workloads, though response time improvements should be evaluated if latency is a constraint.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io