Fidelity vs Zerodha Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Fidelity and Zerodha both maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the monitoring period ending 20 April 2026, with zero recorded incidents. However, Zerodha delivered significantly faster response t

🏦 Fidelity vs Zerodha BANKING & FINANCE · UPTRUE.IO RELIABILITY DATA Week of 20 April 2026
🏦 Banking & Finance Weekly Comparison

Fidelity and Zerodha both maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the monitoring period ending 20 April 2026, with zero recorded incidents. However, Zerodha delivered significantly faster response times, averaging 354ms compared to Fidelity's 659ms—a 46% performance advantage that reflects different architectural approaches in the banking and finance sector.

TL;DR
  • Both providers achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the week of 20 April 2026
  • Zerodha responded 46% faster on average (354ms vs. 659ms)
  • Fidelity and Zerodha each recorded zero minutes of downtime
  • Response time difference suggests Zerodha's infrastructure handles requests with lower latency

Uptime This Week

Fidelity 100.00% Zerodha 100.00% HTTP checks every 5 min · 7-day period · Uptrue independent monitoring

Both Fidelity and Zerodha achieved 100% uptime with zero downtime events recorded across the monitoring period. This perfect score indicates stable infrastructure operations for both providers during the week of 20 April 2026. Neither service experienced detectable outages or service interruptions that would impact user availability.

Response Time

Zerodha 354ms Fidelity 659ms Lower is better · Median TTFB · Excludes model inference time

Zerodha's average response time of 354ms significantly outpaced Fidelity's 659ms, representing a 305ms improvement in performance. For financial services where transaction speed and data retrieval latency matter operationally, Zerodha's faster baseline response suggests more efficient request handling. This differential may reflect differences in server geography, caching strategies, or load balancing implementation.

Incidents & Downtime

Fidelity No incidents Zerodha No incidents Incident = 2+ consecutive failed checks · 7-day window

Both providers recorded zero incidents and zero minutes of total downtime during the monitoring window. The absence of logged incidents on either platform indicates stable service delivery with no detected service degradation, timeouts, or fault conditions triggering alerts. This clean record reflects mature infrastructure operation in both cases.

Historical Context
Banking and finance services typically maintain high uptime standards due to regulatory requirements and customer expectations around trading hours and fund access. Services in this category generally compete on both reliability and speed, making response time increasingly important alongside availability metrics.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Zerodha if response time and request latency are primary concerns for your use case, given the 46% speed advantage observed. Select Fidelity if you require specific features, compliance frameworks, or integrations that provider offers, as both delivered equivalent availability during the monitoring period. For latency-sensitive applications (algorithmic trading, real-time quotes), Zerodha's performance profile is preferable.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable—Fidelity or Zerodha?
Both providers demonstrated equal reliability during the week of 20 April 2026, each achieving 100% uptime with zero incidents. Reliability data shows no meaningful difference between them. Zerodha offered faster response times (354ms vs. 659ms), but this measures performance, not reliability. Choose based on feature requirements rather than uptime considerations, as both are equally dependable by availability metrics.
How often does Fidelity or Zerodha experience downtime?
Neither Fidelity nor Zerodha recorded downtime during the monitoring period ending 20 April 2026. Fidelity logged zero incidents and zero downtime minutes, as did Zerodha. One week of monitoring cannot predict long-term downtime frequency, but both providers showed stable operations without service interruptions during this period.
How is this reliability data collected?
This data comes from Uptrue's independent monitoring of both providers' publicly accessible endpoints. Uptrue continuously tests uptime, response times, and incident occurrence without partnership or access to internal metrics. The monitoring captures external service availability and performance as experienced by users, measured during the week of 20 April 2026.
Get weekly reliability reports in your inbox
Every Monday: uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends across 200 monitored providers.
ShareX / TwitterLinkedIn
Get weekly reliability reports
Uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends — every Monday.
Uptrue TeamWebsite Monitoring Platform