Fidelity and Vanguard both delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring period of 20–26 April 2026, each maintaining 100% availability with zero incidents. However, their response time performance differed significantly, with Vanguard averaging 214ms versus Fidelity's 659ms.
- Both providers achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the week
- Vanguard responded 3× faster: 214ms average vs. Fidelity's 659ms
- Zero unplanned downtime recorded across both platforms
- Data collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring service
Uptime This Week
Both Fidelity and Vanguard maintained flawless uptime at 100% throughout the monitoring week. Neither provider experienced any recorded incidents or downtime, indicating stable infrastructure performance during this period.
Response Time
Vanguard demonstrated substantially faster response times, averaging 214ms compared to Fidelity's 659ms—a 445ms differential. For financial platforms where latency directly impacts user experience, this performance gap is material.
Incidents & Downtime
Zero incidents were recorded for either provider during the week of 20–26 April 2026. Both platforms maintained continuous availability, with no maintenance windows, service degradation, or unplanned outages logged.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose based on your latency tolerance. Vanguard is the stronger choice if sub-250ms response times matter for your use case; Fidelity remains viable for applications where 659ms latency is acceptable. Both demonstrated equal reliability during this period.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io