Crypto.com and Ledger both delivered perfect uptime during the monitoring week of April 20, 2026, according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. However, response time performance differed significantly: Ledger averaged 130ms while Crypto.com recorded 288ms.
- Both providers achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring period
- Ledger responded 158ms faster on average (130ms vs. 288ms)
- Zero total downtime recorded across both services
- Both providers maintain operational status pages with incident notification systems
Uptime This Week
Both Crypto.com and Ledger maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the week, with zero recorded incidents or downtime minutes. This monitoring data, collected by Uptrue's independent infrastructure, confirms both services operated without interruption during this period.
Response Time
Ledger demonstrated significantly faster response times at an average of 130ms compared to Crypto.com's 288ms—a 158ms difference. For users requiring low-latency access, this response time gap represents a material performance distinction between the two providers.
Incidents & Downtime
Neither provider experienced any incidents or downtime during the monitoring week. Both services maintained continuous availability, with zero minutes of total downtime recorded by Uptrue's monitoring systems.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Ledger if response time and latency-sensitive operations are priorities; the 158ms speed advantage is meaningful for high-frequency interactions. Select Crypto.com if you require a broader range of crypto services and can tolerate the slower response profile. Both providers performed identically on availability during this period.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io