Chase and Robinhood both maintained perfect uptime during the week of 20 April 2026, with zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime reported by Uptrue's independent monitoring. However, Robinhood demonstrated significantly faster response times, averaging 73ms compared to Chase's 277ms.
- Both Chase and Robinhood achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring period
- Robinhood's average response time was 73ms versus Chase's 277ms—a 73% improvement
- Neither provider experienced any downtime events over the seven-day period
- Response time differential suggests Robinhood maintains faster infrastructure performance despite equal availability
Uptime This Week
Both providers maintained perfect 100% uptime throughout the monitoring week with zero recorded incidents. This parity indicates both Chase and Robinhood met their critical availability requirements without service interruptions during this period.
Response Time
Robinhood responded 4.8x faster than Chase, averaging 73ms versus 277ms per request. While both fall within acceptable ranges for financial services, Robinhood's superior response time suggests more optimized infrastructure or CDN performance.
Incidents & Downtime
Neither provider logged any incidents or downtime events during the week. This zero-incident result is positive for both but limits comparative insight into how each provider handles failure modes or recovery.
Which Should You Choose?
For applications prioritizing speed and user experience, Robinhood's sub-100ms response times offer a tangible advantage. For critical-path applications where both providers show equal reliability, choose based on feature set, API design, and cost rather than uptime alone.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io