collaboration

Calendly vs Loom Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

💬 Collaboration Tools Weekly Comparison

Calendly and Loom both maintained perfect uptime during the monitoring period of April 20–26, 2026, according to Uptree's independent monitoring. Loom delivered faster response times at 98ms average, while Calendly averaged 147ms. Both services experienced zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime.

TL;DR

Calendly: 100% uptime, 147ms average response time, 0 incidents
Loom: 100% uptime, 98ms average response time, 0 incidents
Loom was 33% faster in response time during the monitoring window
Both providers reported no service disruptions over the seven-day period

Uptime This Week

Both Calendly and Loom achieved 100% uptime during the April 20–26 monitoring period. This level of reliability matches their official status pages, which reported no service issues or system disruptions. Neither provider experienced any downtime events measurable by Uptrue's monitoring infrastructure.

Response Time

Loom demonstrated superior response performance with an average of 98ms, while Calendly responded at 147ms on average. The 49ms difference suggests Loom's infrastructure handled requests more efficiently during this period. Both response times remain well within acceptable ranges for collaboration tools, where sub-200ms latency is standard.

Incidents & Downtime

No incidents were recorded for either provider during the monitoring period. Both services maintained continuous availability with zero minutes of recorded downtime. This clean incident record aligns with both organizations' official status reporting.

Historical Context

Collaboration tools have become increasingly reliable over recent years, with major providers consistently achieving 99.9%+ uptime through distributed infrastructure and redundancy strategies. Providers in this category prioritize availability given the business-critical nature of communication and scheduling workflows.

Which Should You Choose?

For uptime assurance, both providers are equivalent. Choose Loom if response latency is a priority for your use case—its 49ms advantage matters in latency-sensitive workflows. Choose Calendly if scheduling integration depth or feature set better serves your requirements. During this monitoring period, reliability should not be a differentiator between them.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable, Calendly or Loom?

During April 20–26, 2026, both achieved identical 100% uptime with zero incidents. Uptrue's independent monitoring found no reliability difference between them over this period. Long-term reliability trends would require extended monitoring beyond a single week.

How often does Calendly experience downtime?

Calendly recorded zero downtime incidents during Uptrue's seven-day monitoring window. The official Calendly status page reported 100% uptime from January through April 2026. Individual outage frequency depends on longer observation periods and specific infrastructure events.

How is this reliability data collected?

All data in this report comes from Uptrue's independent uptime monitoring service, which continuously probes both calendly.com and loom.com to measure availability and response times. Uptrue does not rely on provider-submitted data and operates independently of both companies. Monitoring captures real-world performance metrics without vendor influence.