Atlassian vs Hashnode Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Atlassian and Hashnode both delivered strong reliability during the week of 20 April 2026, according to independent monitoring by Uptrue. Atlassian achieved 100% uptime with 174ms average response tim

⚙️ Atlassian vs Hashnode DEV TOOLS & CI/CD · UPTRUE.IO RELIABILITY DATA Week of 20 April 2026
⚙️ Dev Tools & CI/CD Weekly Comparison

Atlassian and Hashnode both delivered strong reliability during the week of 20 April 2026, according to independent monitoring by Uptrue. Atlassian achieved 100% uptime with 174ms average response times, while Hashnode recorded 99.75% uptime with faster 154ms responses. Both providers reported zero incidents during the monitoring period.

TL;DR
  • Atlassian maintained perfect 100% uptime; Hashnode achieved 99.75% uptime
  • Hashnode delivered faster average response times (154ms vs. 174ms)
  • Both providers experienced zero incidents and zero minutes of downtime
  • Data collected via independent Uptrue monitoring for the week of 20 April 2026

Uptime This Week

Atlassian 100.00% Hashnode 99.75% HTTP checks every 5 min · 7-day period · Uptrue independent monitoring

Atlassian's 100% uptime represents flawless availability during the monitoring window, while Hashnode's 99.75% uptime suggests minimal but measurable availability impact. The 0.25 percentage-point difference translates to approximately 21.6 seconds of unavailability over a seven-day period. Both figures exceed typical SLA thresholds for production-grade services.

Response Time

Hashnode 154ms Atlassian 174ms Lower is better · Median TTFB · Excludes model inference time

Hashnode demonstrated superior response performance at 154ms average, outpacing Atlassian's 174ms by 20 milliseconds. Both response times fall within acceptable ranges for web services, though Hashnode's edge may be notable for latency-sensitive applications. The difference is modest enough that geographic location and network conditions would likely have greater impact on end-user experience.

Incidents & Downtime

Atlassian No incidents Hashnode No incidents Incident = 2+ consecutive failed checks · 7-day window

Neither provider reported incidents during the monitoring period, with both maintaining zero minutes of downtime. This alignment suggests stable infrastructure conditions across the Dev Tools & CI/CD category during this week. The absence of incidents should be weighted against the longer historical context when making reliability decisions.

Historical Context
Development tools and CI/CD platforms typically maintain uptime in the 99.9–99.99% range during normal operations. Brief incidents affecting these services often stem from deployments, database maintenance, or cloud infrastructure changes rather than fundamental reliability weaknesses.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Atlassian for mission-critical workflows where 100% uptime is demonstrably important; choose Hashnode if response latency is a primary concern or cost efficiency is weighted heavily. For most teams, either provider meets production requirements—evaluate based on feature fit, integration ecosystem, and total cost of ownership rather than the marginal uptime difference observed in this single week.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable based on this data?
Atlassian showed higher uptime at 100% compared to Hashnode's 99.75% during this monitoring period. However, both achieved zero downtime incidents; the difference reflects measurement precision rather than practical availability gaps. Reliability decisions should incorporate historical performance data beyond a single week.
How often does Hashnode experience downtime?
During the week of 20 April 2026, Hashnode reported zero downtime incidents and zero minutes of total downtime, according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. The 99.75% uptime metric suggests minimal unavailability—approximately 21.6 seconds over seven days—but this single week does not establish typical frequency patterns.
How is this reliability data collected?
All metrics in this report come from Uptrue's independent monitoring service, which tracks uptime percentages, response times, and incident occurrence from external vantage points. Uptrue does not rely on provider-supplied status pages or internal metrics, ensuring impartial measurement of actual service availability.
Get weekly reliability reports in your inbox
Every Monday: uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends across 200 monitored providers.
ShareX / TwitterLinkedIn
Get weekly reliability reports
Uptime rankings, incident summaries, and response time trends — every Monday.
Uptrue TeamWebsite Monitoring Platform