devtools

Atlassian vs FullStory Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Atlassian and FullStory both delivered perfect uptime during the week of 20 April 2026, according to independent monitoring by Uptrue. Atlassian averaged 174ms response times while FullStory responded

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

⚙️ Dev Tools & CI/CD Weekly Comparison

TL;DR

Both Atlassian and FullStory achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring period
FullStory outperformed on response speed: 124ms average vs. Atlassian's 174ms
Combined total downtime across both providers: 0 minutes
Response time difference of 50ms favors FullStory for latency-sensitive applications

Uptime This Week

Both providers maintained 100% uptime with zero recorded incidents during the monitoring window. Neither service experienced any measurable downtime, meeting the highest reliability standard for mission-critical development tools. This represents an optimal outcome for organizations dependent on either platform.

Response Time

FullStory demonstrated faster average response times at 124ms compared to Atlassian's 174ms—a 40% improvement in latency. For teams relying on rapid feedback loops in CI/CD pipelines, FullStory's lower response overhead provides a meaningful performance advantage. Both responses remain well within acceptable thresholds for development workflows.

Incidents & Downtime

Zero incidents were recorded for either provider during this period, indicating stable infrastructure across both platforms. The absence of downtime events suggests both Atlassian and FullStory maintained consistent service delivery to their user bases. This clean record applies equally to both Dev Tools & CI/CD operations.

Historical Context

Enterprise Dev Tools & CI/CD platforms have increasingly prioritized infrastructure redundancy and geographic distribution, making extended outages less common across the category. However, performance variability and isolated incidents remain differentiation factors among major providers.

Which Should You Choose?

Both providers proved reliable during this monitoring period, so selection should hinge on secondary factors. FullStory's 50ms response time advantage makes it preferable for performance-critical integrations and real-time feedback requirements. Atlassian remains a solid choice for organizations prioritizing feature breadth and ecosystem integration.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable—Atlassian or FullStory?

During this monitoring period, both achieved identical reliability metrics: 100% uptime and zero incidents. FullStory held a performance edge with 40% faster response times (124ms vs. 174ms), but reliability was equivalent. Long-term reliability assessment requires monitoring beyond a single week.

How often does FullStory experience downtime?

FullStory recorded zero downtime incidents during the week of 20 April 2026 according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. A single week provides insufficient data to establish downtime frequency patterns; extended monitoring is needed for trend analysis.

How is this reliability data collected?

All data originates from Uptrue's independent uptime monitoring service, which continuously measures availability, response times, and incidents for tracked providers. Uptrue operates independently of both Atlassian and FullStory, ensuring unbiased measurement of their infrastructure performance.