devtools

Atlassian vs crates.io Uptime — Week of 20 April 2026

Uptrue's independent monitoring tracked Atlassian and crates.io during the week of 20 April 2026. Atlassian maintained 100% uptime with zero incidents, while crates.io registered 0% uptime during the

23 April 2026·Uptrue Team

⚙️ Dev Tools & CI/CD Weekly Comparison

Uptrue's independent monitoring tracked Atlassian and crates.io during the week of 20 April 2026. Atlassian maintained 100% uptime with zero incidents, while crates.io registered 0% uptime during the monitoring period. This report reflects data collected directly by Uptrue's monitoring infrastructure.

TL;DR

Atlassian achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents and 0 minutes of downtime
crates.io reported 0% uptime during the monitoring period
Atlassian averaged 174ms response time; crates.io response data was unavailable
Neither provider recorded incidents in Uptrue's independent monitoring logs

Uptime This Week

Atlassian delivered perfect uptime at 100% during the monitoring window with zero recorded incidents. crates.io showed 0% uptime, indicating complete unavailability throughout the measurement period. The disparity suggests either sustained infrastructure issues at crates.io or monitoring collection gaps requiring further investigation.

Response Time

Atlassian maintained an average response time of 174ms, indicating consistent application performance. Response time data for crates.io was unavailable due to the 0% uptime condition during monitoring.

Incidents & Downtime

Atlassian recorded zero incidents and zero downtime minutes across the entire week. crates.io similarly showed zero incidents logged, though the 0% uptime metric indicates persistent unavailability that warrants clarification regarding monitoring methodology or actual service status.

Historical Context

Dev Tools and CI/CD platforms typically sustain 99.9% or higher uptime, as build interruptions directly impact development velocity and deployment cycles. Services in this category face intense scrutiny for reliability, as even brief outages cascade across engineering workflows.

Which Should You Choose?

For production CI/CD workloads requiring high reliability, Atlassian's demonstrated 100% uptime and 174ms response times make it the stronger choice. crates.io's 0% uptime reading during this period warrants verification and further monitoring before deployment decisions.

About This Data
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is more reliable based on this monitoring data?

According to Uptrue's independent monitoring, Atlassian demonstrated 100% uptime with zero incidents during the week of 20 April 2026, while crates.io reported 0% uptime. Atlassian clearly showed higher reliability during this measurement period.

How often did these services experience downtime?

Atlassian recorded zero downtime incidents totaling 0 minutes. crates.io's 0% uptime indicates continuous unavailability throughout the monitoring window, though zero incidents were logged, suggesting a possible monitoring or data collection anomaly that should be investigated further.

How does Uptrue collect this reliability data?

All data in this report comes from Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure, which continuously probes target endpoints to measure uptime, response time, and incident frequency. Uptrue does not rely on provider-supplied status pages but instead performs direct, real-world measurements of service availability.