During the week of 20 April 2026, both Asana and Coda maintained perfect uptime according to Uptrue's independent monitoring. However, significant performance differences emerged: Coda delivered an average response time of 38ms, while Asana averaged 181ms—a 4.8x performance gap.
- Both providers achieved 100% uptime with zero incidents during the monitoring period
- Coda responded 4.8x faster than Asana (38ms vs 181ms average)
- Neither service experienced downtime or service interruptions
- Response time variance suggests different infrastructure scaling or geographic distribution strategies
Uptime This Week
Both Asana and Coda maintained 100% availability throughout the week, with zero incidents recorded. This perfect uptime reflects baseline reliability expectations for enterprise collaboration platforms. Neither provider experienced measurable downtime.
Response Time
Coda's average response time of 38ms substantially outperformed Asana's 181ms. For teams dependent on real-time collaboration features, this 143ms latency difference compounds across thousands of daily interactions, potentially affecting perceived responsiveness and user experience.
Incidents & Downtime
No incidents occurred for either provider during the monitoring window. Both services maintained their stated service levels without degradation or unplanned maintenance events.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Coda if response latency directly impacts your workflow (real-time document editing, live collaboration). Select Asana if your usage patterns tolerate 180ms response times and your primary concern is availability. Both proved equally reliable during this period.
All uptime, response time, and incident data is collected by Uptrue's independent monitoring infrastructure. HTTP checks run every 5 minutes. An incident is recorded only after 2+ consecutive failed checks. Uptrue is not affiliated with any monitored service. For corrections: reports@uptrue.io